GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 11% more power consumption, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 504 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3022 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 186% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 37% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | R700 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |