GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 200 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 12% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is 293 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 212 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 61% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GM204 | Wimbledon XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K2200M
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K5000
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro K2200M
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro K5000
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL