GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon Pro 555
When choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 555, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 555.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 298 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |