GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon Pro 555X
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 555X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 298 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 555X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 43.54 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |