GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
When choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 4130, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 4130.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4130.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 73% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 57% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 77% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 65% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GM204 | Polaris |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |