GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1775% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 342% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 184% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Bristol Ridge |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3100 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |