GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon R7 M370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R7 M370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Radeon R7 M370, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M370.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 318 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R7 M370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 4012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Litho |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |