GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon R7 M465
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R7 M465. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R7 M465. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 268 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R7 M465 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 157% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Litho XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |