GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon R9 M290X
When choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M290X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M290X.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R9 M290X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M290X - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M290X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 293 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M290X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3812 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M290X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R9 M290X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Neptune |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 300 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Check Price |