GRID M60 8Q vs UHD Graphics 617
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and UHD Graphics 617, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and UHD Graphics 617 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
UHD Graphics 617 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 617 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 617 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | UHD Graphics 617 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 617.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 617 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 617 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 617 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 257 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 617.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 617 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 85% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 170% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | UHD Graphics 617 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | GM204 | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 30 October 2018 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |