FireStream 9250 vs HD Graphics 4400
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and HD Graphics 4400 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 4400 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | HD Graphics 4400 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 650% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 4400 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 4400 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and HD Graphics 4400 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 425 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 4400 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and HD Graphics 4400 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 33% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than HD Graphics 4400. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | HD Graphics 4400 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | RV770 | Haswell GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 20 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 22.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 46 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |