FireStream 9270 vs HD Graphics 4400
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 4400, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 4400.
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 4400 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 700% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 4400 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 4400 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and HD Graphics 4400 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 550 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 4400 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 4400 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 4400 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 159% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 29% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 90% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than HD Graphics 4400. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 4400 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | RV770 | Haswell GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 20 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 22.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 46 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |