GRID K240Q vs HD Graphics 4400
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and HD Graphics 4400. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and HD Graphics 4400. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | HD Graphics 4400 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 1025% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 4400 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 4400 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics 4400 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 545 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 4400 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 4400 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 141% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 250% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 42% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 210% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 156% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | HD Graphics 4400 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 20 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 22.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 46 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |