HD Graphics 4400 vs Quadro 2000D
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro 2000D. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro 2000D. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 210% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 425 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 72% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 22% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 20 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.00 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |