HD Graphics 4400 vs Quadro 3000M
When comparing HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro 3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro 3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro 3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro 3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 or Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 4400
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
20 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 275% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 3000M is 250 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
6−7
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
low / 768p
55−60
120−130
medium / 768p
30−33
95−100
ultra / 1080p
6−7
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
18−20
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
low / 768p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 72% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
10−12
medium / 1080p
−
4−5
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
4−5
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
high / 1080p
60−65
80−85
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
10−11
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
low / 720p
0−1
6−7
low / 768p
0−1
10−11
medium / 768p
−
8−9
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 92% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
Full Specs
HD Graphics 4400
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Fermi
Code name
Haswell GT2
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
22 February 2011
Pipelines
20
240
Core clock speed
200 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
22.00
18.00
Floating-point performance
46 gflops
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
