HD Graphics 4400 vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 650% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 402 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 450% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 66% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than HD Graphics 4400. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 20 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.00 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- HD Graphics 4400 vs Radeon R7 M460
- HD Graphics 4400 vs Radeon HD 7690M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 M460
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7690M
- HD Graphics 4400 vs GeForce GT 645M
- HD Graphics 4400 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics