HD Graphics 4400 vs Quadro K3000M

When comparing HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

HD Graphics 4400 Check Price

Quadro K3000M Check Price

HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 or Quadro K3000M here:

HD Graphics 4400 Laptops

Quadro K3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	HD Graphics 4400	Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K3000M has 275% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 454 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
low / 768p	55−60	140−150
medium / 768p	30−33	120−130
ultra / 1080p	6−7	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	18−20	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	65−70
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 113% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 204% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
high / 1080p	60−65	90−95
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	75−80	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 35% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than HD Graphics 4400.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	16−18	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than HD Graphics 4400.

Full Specs

	HD Graphics 4400	Quadro K3000M
Architecture	Gen. 7.5 Haswell	Kepler
Code name	Haswell GT2	N14E-Q1
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	5 June 2013	1 June 2012
Pipelines	20	576
Core clock speed	200 MHz	654 MHz
Boost Clock	1100 MHz
Transistor count	392 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	22.00	31.39
Floating-point performance	46 gflops	753.4 gflops
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed		2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth		89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.80	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		24 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price	Check Price

HD Graphics 4400 vs Quadro K3000M

HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares