HD Graphics 4400 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics 4400 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics 4400 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1025% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 374 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 4400 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 86% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 181% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 100% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 20 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |