GeForce GTX 280 vs HD Graphics 5000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and HD Graphics 5000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against HD Graphics 5000, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 686% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5000 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 5000 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 1096 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5000 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Fortnite is 13% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 7% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GT200 | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 44.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |