HD Graphics 5000 vs Quadro FX 4800
In this comparison between HD Graphics 5000 and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 5000 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5000 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5000 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 402 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 5000 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| HD Graphics 5000 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 20% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 3% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 5000 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |