HD Graphics 5000 vs Radeon R9 370
In this comparison between HD Graphics 5000 and Radeon R9 370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 5000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 370
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 5000 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 266% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5000 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5000 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 725 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 1320% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
HD Graphics 5000 and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 240% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 167% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 526% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1060% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 4500% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 49% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2133% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than HD Graphics 5000. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 5000 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | Trinidad |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 40 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.00 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |