HD Graphics 5000 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between HD Graphics 5000 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 5000 and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 5000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 650% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5000 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5000 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 374 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 53% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 23% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 5000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |