GeForce GTX 460 SE vs HD Graphics 515
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and HD Graphics 515, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and HD Graphics 515 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
HD Graphics 515 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 515 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 515 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | HD Graphics 515 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 900% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 515.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 515 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 515 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and HD Graphics 515 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1000 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 515.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 515 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 515 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 515 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 62% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 105% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 22% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 55% more, than HD Graphics 515. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | HD Graphics 515 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GF104 | Skylake GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 288 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 22.80 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |