GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs HD Graphics 515
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and HD Graphics 515 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 515 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
HD Graphics 515 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 515 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 515 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | HD Graphics 515 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 966% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 515.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 515 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 515 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 515 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 479 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 515.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 515 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 360% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 515 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and HD Graphics 515 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 115% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 22% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than HD Graphics 515. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | HD Graphics 515 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GF114 | Skylake GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 22.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |