HD Graphics 515 vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between HD Graphics 515 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 515 and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
HD Graphics 515 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 515 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 515 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 515 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 515.
- HD Graphics 515 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 515 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 515 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 515.
- HD Graphics 515 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 700% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 155% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 2300% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1133% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 515 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.80 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |