HD Graphics 515 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between HD Graphics 515 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 515 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
HD Graphics 515 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 515 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 515 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 515 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 515.
- HD Graphics 515 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 515 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 515 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 515.
- HD Graphics 515 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 640% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 140% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 233% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 540% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 2000% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 966% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 515 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.80 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |