FirePro W8100 vs HD Graphics 530
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and HD Graphics 530 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 530 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | HD Graphics 530 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1366% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 530 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 530 has 56 GB more memory, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 530 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 530 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 474 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 530 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 711% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W8100 and HD Graphics 530 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 44% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | HD Graphics 530 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | Hawaii | Skylake GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 5 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |