FireStream 9370 vs HD Graphics 530
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and HD Graphics 530, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and HD Graphics 530.
FireStream 9370
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 530 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 530 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 530 has 60 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 530 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and HD Graphics 530 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 475 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 530 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 21% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than HD Graphics 530. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 530 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Cypress | Skylake GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 5 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 27.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |