HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro 4000M
In this comparison between HD Graphics 530 and Quadro 4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 530 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 530 and Quadro 4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: HD Graphics 530 and Quadro 4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 or Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 530
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
HD Graphics 530 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
HD Graphics 530 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
HD Graphics 530 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
HD Graphics 530 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 125 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
21−24
24−27
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
high / 768p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
HD Graphics 530 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 18% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
4−5
8−9
ultra / 1080p
2−3
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
7−8
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
65−70
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
−
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro 4000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
HD Graphics 530 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p
10−11
16−18
medium / 768p
8−9
12−14
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
HD Graphics 530 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
HD Graphics 530
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Fermi
Code name
Skylake GT2
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 August 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
24
336
Core clock speed
350 MHz
475 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
27.60
26.60
Floating-point performance
403.2 gflops
638.4 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.97
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
