HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 530 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1472 GB more memory, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 530 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 252 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 530 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 August 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |