HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro K2200M
When choosing between HD Graphics 530 and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 530 and Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 530 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics 530 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- HD Graphics 530 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 530 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 317 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
HD Graphics 530 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 108% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 237% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 33% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than HD Graphics 530. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 530 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Maxwell |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 August 2015 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |