HD Graphics 530 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
When comparing HD Graphics 530 and Radeon HD 4850 X2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between HD Graphics 530 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 530 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 448 GB more memory, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 530 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 275 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Fortnite is 15% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Minecraft is 3% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| HD Graphics 530 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 530 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | TeraScale |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | R700 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 August 2015 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |