FirePro S7000 vs HD Graphics 5300
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and HD Graphics 5300 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 5300 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5300 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5300 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 5300 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 850 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5300 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 242% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 517% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 50% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 928% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 250% more, than HD Graphics 5300. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | Broadwell GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 5 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |