FirePro S7150 vs HD Graphics 5300
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and HD Graphics 5300 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 5300 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 900% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5300 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5300 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 5300 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 820 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5300 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 609% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro S7150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 242% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 740% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 752% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 62% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1400% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 272% more, than HD Graphics 5300. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Tonga | Broadwell GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |