FireStream 9270 vs HD Graphics 5300
When comparing FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 5300, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 5300 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5300 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5300 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and HD Graphics 5300 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 650 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5300 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 7% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 159% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 33% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 133% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | RV770 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 September 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |