GeForce GTX 295 vs HD Graphics 5300
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and HD Graphics 5300. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and HD Graphics 5300. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5300 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5300 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 5300 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 1142 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5300 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5300 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 136% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 246% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 28% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 116% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GT200B | Broadwell GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 5 September 2014 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |