HD Graphics 5300 vs Quadro CX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro CX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the HD Graphics 5300 stacks up against Quadro CX, check out specs charts below.
Quadro CX
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 5300 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 900% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5300 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 502 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 19% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 71% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 207% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 257% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 111% more, than HD Graphics 5300. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 5300 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 September 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- HD Graphics 5300 vs Radeon R7 M350
- HD Graphics 5300 vs FirePro M4100
- Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 M350
- Quadro CX vs FirePro M4100
- HD Graphics 5300 vs GeForce GT 645M
- HD Graphics 5300 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics