HD Graphics 5300 vs Quadro FX 4800
In this comparison between HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 5300 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5300 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 502 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 77% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 136% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 223% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 23% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 111% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |