HD Graphics 5300 vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 5300 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 5300
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
HD Graphics 5300 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 950 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
10−11
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
21−24
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 609% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
low / 768p
85−90
60−65
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
120−130
medium / 768p
18−20
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 242% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
0−1
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 740% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
16−18
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
10−11
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 752% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
80−85
130−140
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
medium / 1080p
75−80
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 62% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
7−8
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1400% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
50−55
high / 768p
9−10
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 272% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
Full Specs
HD Graphics 5300
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell
Code name
Broadwell GT2
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 September 2014
2 October 2015
Pipelines
24
1,024
Core clock speed
100 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
1,300 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
67.20
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price