HD Graphics 5300 vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between HD Graphics 5300 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 5300 and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5300 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 474 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 23% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 21−24 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 454% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 214% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 422% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 470% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 43% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 857% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 244% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |