HD Graphics 5300 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between HD Graphics 5300 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the HD Graphics 5300 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5300 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 474 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 19% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 21−24 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 432% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 214% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 377% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 441% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 43% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 785% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 244% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |