GRID M10 8Q vs HD Graphics 6000
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and HD Graphics 6000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 6000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
HD Graphics 6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 6000 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | HD Graphics 6000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 6000.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 6000 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 6000 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and HD Graphics 6000 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 733 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 6000.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 6000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 480% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 88% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 186% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 416% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 153% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 733% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 540% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 62% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | HD Graphics 6000 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GM107 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |