HD Graphics 6000 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
In this comparison between HD Graphics 6000 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 6000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 6000 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: HD Graphics 6000 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 6000 or Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 6000
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
System Shared
DDR4
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
HD Graphics 6000 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
10−11
27−30
medium / 1080p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
110−120
200−210
medium / 768p
80−85
170−180
ultra / 1080p
30−35
90−95
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
9−10
30−33
high / 768p
55−60
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
90−95
ultra / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 95% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
1−2
16−18
low / 720p
45−50
90−95
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 193% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 433% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
low / 768p
40−45
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
2−3
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 166% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
high / 1080p
1−2
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
2−3
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
3−4
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 733% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
low / 768p
6−7
50−55
medium / 768p
6−7
30−35
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
low / 768p
70−75
100−105
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
high / 768p
27−30
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 67% more, than HD Graphics 6000.
Full Specs
HD Graphics 6000
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Broadwell GT3
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 January 2015
28 May 2019
Pipelines
48
64
Core clock speed
300 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
48.00
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
