FirePro M4000 vs HD Graphics 630
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and HD Graphics 630, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against HD Graphics 630, check out specs charts below.
HD Graphics 630
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | HD Graphics 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4000 has 120% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and HD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 63 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and HD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and HD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 300 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 34% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | HD Graphics 630 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 26.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |