FirePro M6000 vs HD Graphics 630
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and HD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 630
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6000 | HD Graphics 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6000 has 186% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and HD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and HD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and HD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 450 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 43% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 25% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6000 | HD Graphics 630 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | Heathrow | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 26.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |