GRID K240Q vs HD Graphics 630

When choosing between GRID K240Q and HD Graphics 630, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and HD Graphics 630.

GRID K240Q

HD Graphics 630

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	HD Graphics 630
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	64 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
HD Graphics 630 has 63 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	3−4
ultra / 1080p	6−7	1−2
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	16−18	7−8
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and HD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	120−130
medium / 768p	140−150	95−100
ultra / 1080p	75−80	45−50
QHD / 1440p	40−45	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	27−30	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 37% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	12−14	3−4
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	75−80	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	6−7
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	20−22
medium / 1080p	21−24	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	65−70	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	20−22	8−9
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	7−8	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	7−8
medium / 1080p	9−10	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	7−8
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	35−40	16−18
medium / 768p	24−27	12−14
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than HD Graphics 630.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	HD Graphics 630
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	1 January 2017
Pipelines	1536	24
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.40
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	441.6 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+

GRID K240Q vs HD Graphics 630

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares