HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
HD Graphics 630
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M has 266% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 250 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Minecraft is 45% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2000M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 17.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |