HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro K3100M
In this comparison between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro K3100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 630 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 630
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 406 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K3100M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 630 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| HD Graphics 630 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 46% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 73% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |