HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro M4000

In this comparison between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro M4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 630 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

HD Graphics 630

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	HD Graphics 630	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 700% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
HD Graphics 630 has 56 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 473 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	35−40
ultra / 1080p	1−2	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	14−16	60−65
medium / 1080p	5−6	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	7−8	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	18−20	100−110
medium / 1080p	8−9	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	120−130	250−260
medium / 768p	95−100	220−230
ultra / 1080p	45−50	180−190
QHD / 1440p	24−27	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	70−75	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
medium / 1080p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	110−120
ultra / 1080p	27−30	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	3−4	45−50
ultra / 1080p	3−4	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	14−16	80−85
medium / 1080p	5−6	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	12−14	60−65
ultra / 1080p	7−8	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	55−60	180−190
medium / 1080p	14−16	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 357% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	6−7	60−65
ultra / 1080p	6−7	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	20−22	100−110
medium / 1080p	9−10	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	45−50	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	8−9	70−75
ultra / 1080p	3−4	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	7−8	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	85−90	130−140
high / 1080p	65−70	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than HD Graphics 630.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	7−8	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	16−18	130−140
medium / 768p	12−14	85−90
high / 1080p	6−7	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than HD Graphics 630.

Full Specs

	HD Graphics 630	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 January 2017	29 June 2015
Pipelines	24	1664
Core clock speed	300 MHz	773 MHz
Boost Clock	1150 MHz
Transistor count	189 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.40	80.39
Floating-point performance	441.6 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed		6008 MHz
Shared memory	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	+
CUDA		5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		299 Mh/s
Quick Sync	+
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
		Check Price

HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares