HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 520
When choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Radeon 520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 630 and Radeon 520.
HD Graphics 630
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- Radeon 520 has 233% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 730 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Minecraft is 45% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Oland |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | + |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |